Channel Flow Time of Concentration
The channel flow time of concentration, tch, can be computed using the equation
tch=3.6∗vcLc 2:1.3.7
where Lc is the average flow channel length for the subbasin (km), vc is the average channel velocity (m s−1), and 3.6 is a unit conversion factor.
The average channel flow length can be estimated using the equation
Lc=L∗Lcen 2:1.3.8
where L is the channel length from the most distant point to the subbasin outlet (km), and Lcen is the distance along the channel to the subbasin centroid (km). Assuming Lcen=0.5∗L, the average channel flow length is
Lc=0.71∗L 2:1.3.9
The average velocity can be estimated from Manning’s equation assuming a trapezoidal channel with 2:1 side slopes and a 10:1 bottom width-depth ratio.
vc=n0.750.489∗qch0.25∗slpch0.375 2:1.3.10
where vc is the average channel velocity (m s−1), qch is the average channel flow rate (m3s−1), slpch is the channel slope (m m−1), and n is Manning’s roughness coefficient for the channel. To express the average channel flow rate in units of mm/hr, the following expression is used
qch=3.6qch∗∗Area 2.1.3.11
where qch∗is the average channel flow rate (mm hr−1), Area is the subbasin area (km2), and 3.6 is a unit conversion factor. The average channel flow rate is related to the unit source area flow rate (unit source area = 1 ha)
qch∗=q0∗∗(100∗Area)−0.5 2:1.3.12
where q0∗ is the unit source area flow rate (mm hr−1), Area is the subbasin area (km2), and 100 is a unit conversion factor. Assuming the unit source area flow rate is 6.35 mm/hr and substituting equations 2:1.3.11 and 2:1.3.12 into 2:1.3.10 gives
vc=n0.750.317∗Area0.125∗slpch0.375 2:1.3.13
Substituting equations 2:1.3.9 and 2:1.3.13 into 2:1.3.7 gives
tch=Area0.125∗slpch0.3750.62∗L∗n0.75 2:1.3.14
where tch is the time of concentration for channel flow (hr), L is the channel length from the most distant point to the subbasin outlet (km), n is Manning’s roughness coefficient for the channel, Area is the subbasin area (km2), and slpch is the channel slope (m m−1).

Although some of the assumptions used in developing equations 2:1.3.6 and 2:1.3.14 may appear liberal, the time of concentration values obtained generally give satisfactory results for homogeneous subbasins. Since equations 2:1.3.6 and 2:1.3.14 are based on hydraulic considerations, they are more reliable than purely empirical equations.
Last updated