Runoff Volume: Green & Ampt Infiltration Method

The Green & Ampt equation was developed to predict infiltration assuming excess water at the surface at all times (Green & Ampt, 1911). The equation assumes that the soil profile is homogenous and antecedent moisture is uniformly distributed in the profile. As water infiltrates into the soil, the model assumes the soil above the wetting front is completely saturated and there is a sharp break in moisture content at the wetting front. Figure 2:1-2 graphically illustrates the difference between the moisture distribution with depth modeled by the Green & Ampt equation and what occurs in reality.

Mein and Larson (1973) developed a methodology for determining ponding time with infiltration using the Green & Ampt equation. The Green-Ampt Mein-Larson excess rainfall method was incorporated into SWAT+ to provide an alternative option for determining surface runoff. This method requires sub-daily precipitation data supplied by the user.

The Green-Ampt Mein-Larson infiltration rate is defined as:

finf,t=Ke(1+ΨwfΔθvFinf,t)f_{inf,t}=K_e*(1+\frac{\Psi_{wf}*\Delta\theta_v}{F_{inf,t}}) 2:1.2.1

where finff_{inf} is the infiltration rate at time tt (mm/hr), KeK_e is the effective hydraulic conductivity (mm/hr), Ψwf\Psi_{wf} is the wetting front matric potential (mm), Δθv\Delta\theta_v is the change in volumetric moisture content across the wetting front (mm/mm) and FinfF_{inf} is the cumulative infiltration at time tt (mm H2_2O).

When the rainfall intensity is less than the infiltration rate, all the rainfall will infiltrate during the time period and the cumulative infiltration for that time period is calculated:

Finf,t=Finf,t1+RΔtF_{inf,t}=F_{inf,t-1}+R_{\Delta t} 2:1.2.2

where Finf,tF_{inf,t} is the cumulative infiltration for a given time step (mm H2_2O), Finf,t1F_{inf,t-1} is the cumulative infiltration for the previous time step(mm H2_2O), and RΔtR_{\Delta t} is the amount of rain falling during the time step (mm H2_2O).

The infiltration rate defined by equation 2:1.2.1 is a function of the infiltrated volume, which in turn is a function of the infiltration rates in previous time steps. To avoid numerical errors over long time steps, finff_{inf} is replaced by dFinf/dtdF_{inf}/dt in equation 2:1.2.1 and integrated to obtain

Finf,t=Finf,t1+KeΔt+ΨwfΔθvln[Finf,t+ΨwfΔθvFinf,t1+ΨwfΔθv]F_{inf,t}=F_{inf,t-1}+K_e*\Delta t+ \Psi_{wf}*\Delta\theta_v*ln[\frac{F_{inf,t}+\Psi_{wf}*\Delta\theta_v}{F_{inf,t-1}+\Psi_{wf}*\Delta\theta_v}] 2:1.2.3

Equation 2:1.2.3 must be solved iteratively for Finf,tF_{inf,t}, the cumulative infiltration at the end of the time step. A successive substitution technique is used.

The Green-Ampt effective hydraulic conductivity parameter, KeK_e, is approximately equivalent to one-half the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the soil, KsatK_{sat} (Bouwer, 1969). Nearing et al. (1996) developed an equation to calculate the effective hydraulic conductivity as a function of saturated hydraulic conductivity and curve number. This equation incorporates land cover impacts into the calculated effective hydraulic conductivity. The equation for effective hydraulic conductivity is:

Ke=56.82Ksat0.2861+0.051exp(0.062CN)2K_e=\frac{56.82*K_{sat}^{0.286}}{1+0.051*exp(0.062*CN)}-2 2:1.2.4

where KeK_e is the effective hydraulic conductivity (mm/hr), KsatK_{sat} is the saturated hydraulic conductivity (mm/hr), and CNCN is the curve number.

Wetting front matric potential, Ψwf\Psi_{wf}, is calculated as a function of porosity, percent sand and percent clay (Rawls and Brakensiek, 1985):

Ψwf=10exp[6.53097.32561Φsoil+0.001583mc2+3.809479Φsoil2+0.000344msmc0.049837msΦsoil+0.001608ms2Φsoil2+0.001602mc2Φsoil20.0000136ms2mc0.003479mc2Φsoil0.000799ms2Φsoil]\Psi_{wf}=10*exp[6.5309-7.32561*\Phi_{soil}+0.001583*m_c^2+3.809479*\Phi_{soil}^2+0.000344*m_s*m_c-0.049837*m_s*\Phi_{soil}+0.001608*m_s^2*\Phi_{soil}^2+0.001602*m_c^2*\Phi_{soil}^2-0.0000136*m_s^2*m_c-0.003479*m_c^2*\Phi_{soil}-0.000799*m_s^2*\Phi_{soil}]

2:1.2.5

where Φsoil\Phi_{soil} is the porosity of the soil (mm/mm), mcm_c is the percent clay content, and msm_s is the percent sand content.

The change in volumetric moisture content across the wetting front is calculated at the beginning of each day as:

Δθv=(1SWFC)(0.95Φsoil)\Delta\theta_v=(1-\frac{SW}{FC})*(0.95*\Phi_{soil}) 2:1.2.6

where Δθv\Delta\theta_v is the change in volumetric moisture content across the wetting front (mm/mm), SWSW is the soil water content of the entire profile excluding the amount of water held in the profile at wilting point (mm H2_2O), FCFC is the amount of water in the soil profile at field capacity (mm H2_2O), and Φsoil\Phi_{soil} is the porosity of the soil (mm/mm). If a rainfall event is in progress at midnight, Δθv\Delta\theta_v is then calculated:

Δθv=0.001(0.95Φsoil)\Delta\theta_v=0.001*(0.95*\Phi_{soil}) 2:1.2.7

For each time step, SWAT+ calculates the amount of water entering the soil. The water that does not infiltrate into the soil becomes surface runoff.

Table 2:1-2: SWAT+ input variables that pertain to Green & Ampt infiltration calculations.

Variable NameDefinitionInput File

IEVENT

Rainfall, runoff, routing option.

.bsn

IDT

Length of time step (min): Δt\Delta t=IDT/60

file.cio

PRECIPITATION

RΔtR_{\Delta t}: Precipitation during time step (mm H2_2O)

.pcp

SOL_K

KsatK_{sat}: Saturated hydraulic conductivity of first layer (mm/hr)

.sol

CN2

CNCN: Moisture condition II curve number

.mgt

CNOP

CNCN: Moisture condition II curve number

.mgt

SOL_BD

ρb\rho_b: Moist bulk density (Mg/m3m^3): Ψsoil\Psi_{soil}=1 - ρb\rho_b / 2.65

.sol

CLAY

mcm_c: % clay content

.sol

SAND

msm_s: % sand content

.sol

Last updated