arrow-left

All pages
gitbookPowered by GitBook
1 of 3

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Modification of Biomass Calculation for Trees

With annuals and perennials, the plants are able to reach full maturity within a single calendar year. With trees, a number of years are needed for a plant to transition from a seedling to a sapling to a fully-developed tree. The parameters in the plant growth database related to radiation-use efficiency represent the annual growth for a fully-developed tree. The heat units to maturity input in the management file is also used to simulate growth within a single year, defining for trees and perennials the period within a year bounded by the development of buds at the beginning of the annual growing season and the maturation of plant seeds at the end of the growing season.

To simulate the smaller amount of biomass accumulation seen in seedlings/saplings, tree growth within a single year is limited to a fixed amount determined by the age of the tree relative to the number of years for the tree species to reach full development. Parameters in the plant growth database define the total number of years for trees to reach full development as well as the biomass of a fully-developed tree. Until the trees in an HRU reach full development, the amount of biomass they can accumulate in a single year is limited to:

bioannual=1000βˆ—(yrcuryrfulldev)βˆ—biofulldevbio_{annual}=1000*(\frac{yr_{cur}}{yr_{fulldev}})*bio_{fulldev}bioannual​=1000βˆ—(yrfulldev​yrcur​​)βˆ—biofulldev​ 5:2.1.9

where bioannualbio_{annual}bioannual​ is the amount of biomass a tree can accumulate in a single year (kg/ha), is the current age of the tree (years), is the number of years for the tree species to reach full development (years), is the biomass of a fully developed tree stand for the specific tree species (metric tons/ha), and 1000 is a conversion factor.

Once the total growth in biomass in a year, , reaches the annual limit, , no more growth occurs until the next year when a new annual limit is calculated. When a tree stand has reached its biomass limit in a year, the increase in plant biomass for a day,, is set to 0.

yrcuryr_{cur}yrcur​
yrfulldevyr_{fulldev}yrfulldev​
biofulldevbio_{fulldev}biofulldev​
biobiobio
biofulldevbio_{fulldev}biofulldev​
Ξ”bioi\Delta bio_iΞ”bioi​

Biomass Production

The amount of daily solar radiation intercepted by the leaf area of the plant is calculated using Beer’s law (Monsi and Saeki, 1953):

Hphosyn=0.5βˆ—Hdayβˆ—(1βˆ’exp(βˆ’kβ–‘βˆ—LAI))H_{phosyn}=0.5*H_{day}*(1-exp(-k_{\Box}*LAI))Hphosyn​=0.5βˆ—Hdayβ€‹βˆ—(1βˆ’exp(βˆ’kβ–‘β€‹βˆ—LAI)) 5:2.1.1

where HphosynH_{phosyn}Hphosyn​ is the amount of intercepted photosynthetically active radiation on a given day (MJ mβˆ’2^{-2}βˆ’2), HdayH_{day}Hday​ is the incident total solar (MJ mβˆ’2^{-2}βˆ’2), 0.5βˆ—Hday0.5*H_{day}0.5βˆ—Hday​ is the incident photosynthetically active radiation (MJ mβˆ’2^{-2}βˆ’2), kβ–‘k_{\Box}k░​ is the light extinction coefficient, and LAILAILAI is the leaf area index.

Photosynthetically active radiation is radiation with a wavelength between 400 and 700 mm (McCree, 1972). Direct solar beam radiation contains roughly 45% photosynthetically active radiation while diffuse radiation contains around 60% photosynthetically active radiation (Monteith, 1972; Ross, 1975). The fraction of photosynthetically active radiation will vary from day to day with variation in overcast conditions but studies in Europe and Israel indicate that 50% is a representative mean value (Monteith, 1972; Szeicz, 1974; Stanhill and Fuchs, 1977).

Radiation-use efficiency is the amount of dry biomass produced per unit intercepted solar radiation. The radiation-use efficiency is defined in the plant growth database and is assumed to be independent of the plant’s growth stage. The maximum increase in biomass on a given day that will result from the intercepted photosynthetically active radiation is estimated (Monteith, 1977):

5:2.1.2

where is the potential increase in total plant biomass on a given day (kg/ha), is the radiation-use efficiency of the plant (kg/haβ‹…(MJ/m) or 10 g/MJ), and is the amount of intercepted photosynthetically active radiation on a given day (MJ m). Equation 5:2.1.2 assumes that the photosynthetic rate of a canopy is a linear function of radiant energy.

The total biomass on a given day, , is calculated as:

5:2.1.3

where is the total plant biomass on a given day (kg ha), and is the increase in total plant biomass on day (kg/ha).

Impact of Climate on Radiation-Use Efficiency

Radiation-use efficiency is sensitive to variations in atmospheric CO2CO_2CO2​ concentrations and equations have been incorporated into SWAT+ to modify the default radiation-use efficiency values in the plant database for climate change studies. The relationship used to adjust the radiation-use efficiency for effects of elevated CO2CO_2CO2​ is (Stockle et al., 1992):

RUE=100βˆ—CO2CO2+exp(r1βˆ’r2βˆ—CO2)RUE=\frac{100*CO_2}{CO_2+exp(r_1-r_2*CO_2)}RUE=CO2​+exp(r1β€‹βˆ’r2β€‹βˆ—CO2​)100βˆ—CO2​​ 5:2.1.4

where RUERUERUE is the radiation-use efficiency of the plant (kg/haβ‹…(MJ/m2^22)βˆ’1^{-1}βˆ’1 or 10βˆ’1^{-1}βˆ’1 g/MJ), CO2CO_2CO2​ is the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (ppmv), and r1r_1r1​ and r2r_2r2​ are shape coefficients.

The shape coefficients are calculated by solving equation 5:2.1.4 using two known points (RUEambRUE_{amb}RUEamb​, CO2ambCO_{2amb}CO2amb​) and (, ):

5:2.1.5

5:2.1.6

where is the first shape coefficient, is the second shape coefficient, is the ambient atmospheric concentration (ppmv), is the radiation-use efficiency of the plant at ambient atmospheric concentration (kg/haβ‹…(MJ/m) or 10 g/MJ), is an elevated atmospheric concentration (ppmv), is the radiation-use efficiency of the plant at the elevated atmospheric concentration, , (kg/haβ‹…(MJ/m) or 10 g/MJ). Equation 5:2.1.4 was developed when the ambient atmospheric concentration was 330 ppmv and is valid for carbon dioxide concentrations in the range 330-660 ppmv. Even though the ambient atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide is now higher than 330 ppmv, this value is still used in the calculation. If the concentration used in the simulation is less than 330 ppmv, the model defines RUE = .

Stockle and Kiniry (1990) have shown that a plant’s radiation-use efficiency is affected by vapor pressure deficit. For a plant, a threshold vapor pressure deficit is defined at which the plant’s radiation-use efficiency begins to drop in response to the vapor pressure deficit. The adjusted radiation-use efficiency is calculated:

if 5:2.1.7

if 5:2.1.8

where is the radiation-use efficiency adjusted for vapor pressure deficit (kg/haβ‹…(MJ/m) or 10 g/MJ), is the radiation-use efficiency for the plant at a vapor pressure deficit of 1 kPa (kg/haβ‹…(MJ/m) or 10 g/MJ), is the rate of decline in radiation-use efficiency per unit increase in vapor pressure deficit (kg/haβ‹…(MJ/m)β‹…kPa or (10 g/MJ)β‹…kPa), is the vapor pressure deficit (kPa), and is the threshold vapor pressure deficit above which a plant will exhibit reduced radiation-use efficiency (kPa). The radiation-use efficiency value reported for the plant in the plant growth database, , or adjusted for elevated carbon dioxide levels (equation 5:2.1.4) is the value used for . The threshold vapor pressure deficit for reduced radiation-use efficiency is assumed to be 1.0 kPa for all plants ().

The radiation-use efficiency is never allowed to fall below 27% of . This minimum value was based on field observations (Kiniry, personal communication, 2001).

Ξ”bio=RUEβˆ—Hphosyn\Delta bio=RUE*H_{phosyn}Ξ”bio=RUEβˆ—Hphosyn​
Ξ”bio\Delta bioΞ”bio
RUERUERUE
2^22
βˆ’1^{-1}βˆ’1
βˆ’1^{-1}βˆ’1
HphosynH_{phosyn}Hphosyn​
βˆ’2^{-2}βˆ’2
ddd
bio=βˆ‘i=1dΞ”bioibio=\sum_{i=1}^{d}\Delta bio_ibio=βˆ‘i=1d​Δbioi​
biobiobio
βˆ’1^{-1}βˆ’1
Ξ”bioi\Delta bio_iΞ”bioi​
iii
RUEhiRUE_{hi}RUEhi​
CO2hiCO_{2hi}CO2hi​
r1=1n[CO2amb(0.01βˆ—RUEamb)βˆ’CO2amb]+r2βˆ—CO2ambr1=1n[\frac{CO_{2amb}}{(0.01*RUE_{amb})}-CO_{2amb}]+r_2*CO_{2amb}r1=1n[(0.01βˆ—RUEamb​)CO2ambβ€‹β€‹βˆ’CO2amb​]+r2β€‹βˆ—CO2amb​
r2=(1n[CO2amb(0.01βˆ—RUEamb)βˆ’CO2amb]βˆ’1n[CO2hi(0.01βˆ—RUEhi)βˆ’CO2hi])CO2hiβˆ’CO2ambr_2=\frac{(1n[\frac{CO_{2amb}}{(0.01*RUE_{amb})}-CO_{2amb}]-1n[\frac{CO_{2hi}}{(0.01*RUE_{hi})}-CO_{2hi}])}{CO_{2hi}-CO_{2amb}}r2​=CO2hiβ€‹βˆ’CO2amb​(1n[(0.01βˆ—RUEamb​)CO2ambβ€‹β€‹βˆ’CO2amb​]βˆ’1n[(0.01βˆ—RUEhi​)CO2hiβ€‹β€‹βˆ’CO2hi​])​
r1r1r1
r2r2r2
CO2ambCO_{2amb}CO2amb​
CO2CO_2CO2​
RUEambRUE_{amb}RUEamb​
CO2CO_2CO2​
2^22
βˆ’1^{-1}βˆ’1
βˆ’1^{-1}βˆ’1
CO2hiCO_{2hi}CO2hi​
CO2CO_2CO2​
RUEhiRUE_{hi}RUEhi​
CO2CO_2CO2​
CO2hiCO_{2hi}CO2hi​
2^22
βˆ’1^{-1}βˆ’1
βˆ’1^{-1}βˆ’1
CO2CO_2CO2​
CO2CO_2CO2​
RUEambRUE_{amb}RUEamb​
RUE=RUEvpd=1βˆ’Ξ”ruedclβˆ—(vpdβˆ’vpdthr)RUE=RUE_{vpd=1}-\Delta rue_{dcl}*(vpd-vpd_{thr})RUE=RUEvpd=1β€‹βˆ’Ξ”ruedclβ€‹βˆ—(vpdβˆ’vpdthr​)
vpd>vpdthrvpd>vpd_{thr}vpd>vpdthr​
RUE=RUEvpd=1RUE=RUE_{vpd=1}RUE=RUEvpd=1​
vpd≀vpdthrvpd \le vpd_{thr}vpd≀vpdthr​
RUERUERUE
2^22
βˆ’1^{-1}βˆ’1
βˆ’1^{-1}βˆ’1
RUEvpd=1RUE_{vpd=1}RUEvpd=1​
2^22
βˆ’1^{-1}βˆ’1
βˆ’1^{-1}βˆ’1
Ξ”ruedcl\Delta rue_{dcl}Ξ”ruedcl​
2^22
βˆ’1^{-1}βˆ’1
βˆ’1^{-1}βˆ’1
βˆ’1^{-1}βˆ’1
βˆ’1^{-1}βˆ’1
vpdvpdvpd
vpdthrvpd_{thr}vpdthr​
RUEambRUE_{amb}RUEamb​
RUEvpd=1RUE_{vpd=1}RUEvpd=1​
vpdthr=1.0vpd_{thr}=1.0vpdthr​=1.0
RUEambRUE_{amb}RUEamb​